Files
vt1200/xie/evidence/band_element_dump.txt
arti d8d54bb990 feat(xie): a client-chosen XIE image is displayed on the VT1200
The XIE path now runs end to end: XieCreateImage -> XieCreatePhoto ->
XiePutTile -> XieExport(photomap -> depth-1 pixmap) -> XCopyArea(pixmap ->
window), and the client's tile appears on screen at the client's own window
position, pixel-exact.

TWO FAULTS BEHIND THE LONG DEAD END

1. Device model (harness/mame/vt1200.cpp, opt-in VT1200_ACCEL=1).  The
   accelerator's output port 0x5600200 returns the pixel stream the firmware
   pushed into the FIFO -- the firmware then stores it into the drawable itself
   (file 0x125528: MOVE *B6,*B1 ; ADDK 0x10,B1).  The FIFO read pointer was
   never reset between transfers, so consecutive exports read stale words and
   the same fill produced 759 then 516 set pixels.  Reset m_fifo_in/out on the
   data-register write; the export is now deterministic.

2. Measurement, not the device.
   - dwt/screenshot.py without --real reads 1024x1024 at a 128-byte row stride,
     but the VR319 default programs 1280x1024 at a 2048-bit (256-byte) pitch.
     That is the "shifted" picture; --real is the correct read.
   - The earlier "0 differing bytes over 128 KiB" VRAM comparison stepped peek
     by 1024 *bit* addresses, so it scanned rows 0..63 only -- never the window
     at rows 200..263.  Over the real raster the white/black diff is 576 bytes
     spanning exactly those rows.
   - New instrument: decclient does a server-side XGetImage readback of the
     pixmap and window and counts set pixels.  That separated "the server never
     drew it" from "the framebuffer view is wrong".

EVIDENCE (reproduced twice, the second time from a fresh machine)

  no export vs 0xFF : 4096 / 4096 pixels differ
  no export vs 0x00 :    0 / 4096   (the window background is black)
  0xFF      vs 0x00 : 4096 / 4096
  0xAA      vs 0x0F : 2048 / 4096   (the two stripe phases)

Tile byte 0xAA reproduces as 1-pixel vertical stripes, 0x0F as 4-pixel, with
no shear -- so the placement is right and the pixels are the client's.

Contents: xie/ holds DEC XIE 2.3 headers, 84 man pages and complete
client+server source; a libXie.a and decclient built from DEC's own code; the
XIE probes; and evidence/ with every measurement, including explicit
retractions of the earlier wrong readings (VRAM_IDENTICAL_FOR_BOTH_FILLS and
friends).  xie/evidence/XIE_IMAGE_DISPLAYED.md is the report; frames are in
xie/evidence/png/.

The accelerator model stays opt-in: it answers the status poll and relays the
pixel stream, but performs no compositing, so it is a stand-in and the verified
default configuration is unchanged (a no-env run still parks in the level-0
diagnostics menu at PC=3FDCE400).
2026-11-01 23:22:25 +02:00

37 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext

BAND / ELEMENT STRUCTURE DUMPED, BEFORE AND AFTER A BIND ATTEMPT.
Setup: valid c.new_id ids; object pointers taken from the REGIDSTORE breakpoint
(fix: the log line starts "REGIDSTORE", not "IDSTORE" -- my earlier anchored
grep silently matched nothing).
IMG = 00403000 -> obj 003FD110 class=2 b8=1 b9=1 p44=003DC4B0
FLO = 00404000 -> obj 00382B90 class=1 b8=0x80 b9=0x32 p44=00386510
The IMAGE resource ALREADY has an element pointer at band_array+0xd8, before any
bind:
band[] at 003DC4B0: 00000000 00000000 00050029 40002005 48000000 48003DC5
elem = *(003DC4B0 + 0xd8) = 003FD7D0
elem[]: 01050001 00000002 00100000 00000100 00004000 00000000
(0x01050001 as bytes = 01 00 05 01; then 2; then 0x00100000; then 0x100 = 256;
then 0x4000 = 16384. 256 and 16384 are plausibly pitch/geometry values.)
The PHOTOflo (class 1) has no element (*(p44+0xd8) reads 0x55555555, the heap
fill), and its band array is two pointers: 00382CD0 00382F50.
BIND attempts:
slot 11 [img,flo] -> BadIDChoice(14)
slot 11 [flo,img] -> BadIDChoice(14)
(both orders rejected here, although the previous turn recorded a REPLY for
the same request shape -- that difference was not explained)
Effect on the photoflo: its p44 changed 00386510 -> 00382E10 and its band array
became 00382CD0 00386510 ... , i.e. the bind DID touch the photoflo even though
the request reported an error. The image resource was unchanged.
NOT RESOLVED: what the element record's field layout is (its first word 0x01050001
does not decompose into a recognisable type/flag pair), what the bind is meant to
write, or how the element chain is meant to be constructed. Without the 2.3
element encoding these dumps cannot be turned into a conforming pipeline.