From b32827dc7e479ffe8c4803d9168b9d0ae3e29e07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Werner Almesberger Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 20:43:45 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] Oops. The atusb boards are of course 20100813. 20100902 was the first (failed) attempt to make an atusd board. --- atusd/tests/send-20100909 | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/atusd/tests/send-20100909 b/atusd/tests/send-20100909 index 1c2c614..88ff291 100644 --- a/atusd/tests/send-20100909 +++ b/atusd/tests/send-20100909 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ corrupted frame content. "-" is no reception. Distant Local --------------- --------------- --------------- -100903-red 100903-orange 100908-B +100813-red 100813-orange 100908-B TX 255, -90 255, -90 TX 255, -90 garbled @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ garbled TX 255, -52 255, -86 255, -49 TX 255, -87 255, -49 TX -100903-red 100903-orange 100908-A +100813-red 100813-orange 100908-A TX 255, -90 garbled TX 255, -89 180, -89 @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ TX 255, -87 - - - TX - - TX -100903-red 100903-orange 100908-A (reworked) +100813-red 100813-orange 100908-A (reworked) TX 255, -87 255, -87 TX 255, -87 255, -88 @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ TX 255, -87 255, -88 Conclusions ----------- -- 20100902 (atusb) and 20100908 (atusd) board show similar performance when +- 20100813 (atusb) and 20100908 (atusd) board show similar performance when at least one station is an atusb - resistive divider doesn't work