Same test setup as for send-20100909. Board 100908-A was modified to have
a 220 nH inductor in the C7 position, instead of a 0R resistor.

Distant		Local
---------------	---------------	---------------
100813-red	100813-orange	100908-A	(with inductor)

TX		255, -91	255, -85
TX		255, -90	255, -85
TX		255, -91	-
TX		255, -90	255, -85
TX		255, -91	garbled

-		TX		255, -47
-		TX		255, -47
-		TX		255, -47
-		TX		255, -47
garbled (-90)	TX		255, -47

255, -82	255, -43	TX
255, -82	255, -43	TX
255, -82	255, -43	TX
255, -82	255, -43	TX
255, -82	255, -43	TX

Control experiment:

100813-red	100813-orange	100908-B	(unmodified)

TX		-		255, -83
TX		garbled (-91)	255, -86
TX		-		255, -86
TX		garbled (-91)	255, -86
TX		-		255, -86

255, -83	255, -43	TX
255, -84	255, -43	TX
255, -85	255, -43	TX
255, -84	255, -43	TX
255, -84	255, -43	TX


Summary
-------

Direction			No inductor (1)	With ind. (2)	Change
-------------------------------	---------------	------------	------
100813-red -> 100813-orange	255, -87	255, -91	-4 dB
100813-red -> 100908-A		255, -88	255, -85	+3 dB
100908-A -> 100813-red		255, -85	255, -82	+3 dB

100813-red -> 100813-orange	255, -90	-		?
100813-red -> 100908-B		255, -90	255, -86	+4 dB
100908-B -> 100813-red		255, -87	255, -84	+3 dB

(1) Data from send-20100909
(2) Only 100908-A was modified. Changes in the measurements with
    100908-B show inaccuracies of the test setup.


Conclusion
----------

The differences observed are the same for the modified 100908-A board
and the unmodified 100908-B board. The inductor therefore does not seem
to have a significant effect on transceiver performance.