mirror of
git://projects.qi-hardware.com/ben-wpan.git
synced 2024-11-05 08:29:20 +02:00
6d4ea61ae1
- cntr/README, ecn/INDEX, ecn/ecn0006.txt: moved discussion of the input circuit from README to ECN0006 - cntr/cntr.sch: changed pointer from README to ECN0006 - ecn/ecn0006.txt: added more measurements, explanations, and an analysis of the situation
133 lines
4.9 KiB
Plaintext
133 lines
4.9 KiB
Plaintext
CNTR version 2 input circuit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Problem description
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
The input circuit only works up to about 1 or 2 MHz. The problem is that
|
|
we discharge too slowly though the base of Q1, which in turn keeps the
|
|
transistor turned on too long.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attempted solutions
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
The following alternative designs have been tried:
|
|
|
|
- Alternative 1: set R2 to zero, add a 47 Ohm termination resistor in
|
|
parallel with VR4, and place a 1 kOhm resistor between VR4 and Q1.
|
|
Works up to about 2 MHz, but accepts a lot of HF noise and is very
|
|
sensitive to the signal amplitude.
|
|
|
|
- Alternative 2: increase R2 to 100 Ohm and add a 100 Ohm resistor
|
|
between the input (P5) and ground. This works up to 3 MHz, but only
|
|
for a very limited amplitude range.
|
|
|
|
- Alternative 3: set R2 to zero, add a 100 Ohm resistor in parallel
|
|
with VR4, and add a 100 Ohm resistor between VR4 and Q1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experimental results
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
Lab test were performed on all version 2 variants and also on a version
|
|
1 device. The counters were connected with a ~1.95 m RG-174 cable to a
|
|
Picotest G5100A function generator. The version 1 counter was also
|
|
tested with an unshielded 0.1" ribbon cable of 2.2 m.
|
|
|
|
The signal consisted of square wave bursts with a 50% duty cycle and
|
|
~ 5 ns raise/fall time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Design Frequency Source amplitude Probe input am- V range
|
|
(nominal) (nominal) pli. (measured) acceptable
|
|
------------- ---------- ---------------- --------------- ----------
|
|
Version 1 3 MHz 2.3 - 5.5 V * 2.35 - 5.65 V Y/Y
|
|
(RG-174) 2 MHz 2.1 - 5.5 V * 2.15 - 5.7 V Y/Y
|
|
1 MHz 1.8 - 5.5 V * 1.85 - 5.7 V Y/Y
|
|
|
|
Version 1 3 MHz 1.9 - 5.5 V * 2.2 - 6.5 V + Y/(Y)
|
|
(ribbon) 2 MHz 1.9 - 5.5 V * 1.9 - 6 V + Y/(Y)
|
|
1 MHz 1.8 - 5.5 V * 1.9 - 5.7 V + Y/(Y)
|
|
|
|
Version 2 3 MHz 0.8 - 1.2 V 0.8 - 1.0 V Y/N
|
|
2 MHz 0.8 - 1.6 V 0.8 - 1.0 V Y/N
|
|
1 MHz 0.8 - 5.1 V 0.8 - 2.8 V Y/Y
|
|
|
|
Version 2, 3 MHz 1.7 - 2.8 V 0.85 - 1.4 V N/N
|
|
alternative 1 2 MHz 1.6 - 3.5 V 0.80 - 1.75 V Y/Y
|
|
1 MHz 1.5 - 7.2 V 0.75 - 3.6 V Y/Y
|
|
|
|
Version 2, 3 MHz 1.2 - 2.0 V 0.77 - 1.1 V Y/N
|
|
alternative 2 2 MHz 1.2 - 2.6 V 0.80 - 1.4 V Y/N
|
|
1 MHz 1.1 - 7.3 V 0.75 - 3.9 V Y/Y
|
|
|
|
Version 2, 3 MHz 1.1 - 1.7 V 0.74 - 1.0 V Y/N
|
|
alternative 3 2 MHz 1.1 - 2.4 V 0.74 - 1.3 V Y/N
|
|
1 MHz 1.1 - 7.3 V 0.74 - 3.8 V Y/Y
|
|
|
|
* = range limited by maximum input voltage
|
|
+ = considerable overshoot, reaching about 6.7 V
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following drawing illustrates the setup:
|
|
|
|
Source ----- 50 R ----- Probe -----[1.8 m]----- Cntr
|
|
^ (internal) ^
|
|
| |
|
|
Source, nominal Probe input, measured
|
|
|
|
|
|
In each test the frequency was set and then the nominal source voltage
|
|
was adjusted in increments of 100 mV to find the range at which ten
|
|
consecutive bursts of 50000 cycles each were all received correctly.
|
|
|
|
The source has an output impedance of 50 Ohm, so voltage at the probe
|
|
input (indicated in the table) is roughly half the nominal source
|
|
voltage in the first alternative design, which has a fixed impedance.
|
|
|
|
With version 1, which has a high-impedance input, source and probe
|
|
voltage are roughly the same.
|
|
|
|
The amplitude range of version 2 was considered acceptable if the
|
|
minimum source amplitude was less than 1.65 V and the maximum probe
|
|
input amplitude was greater than 1.65 V.
|
|
|
|
Version 1 amplitudes were considered acceptable if the minimum source
|
|
amplitude was less than or equal to 2.5 V and the maximum source
|
|
amplitude was at least 5.0 V. The ribbon had a better amplitude range
|
|
than the coax cable but produced about 20% overshoot. (Only about
|
|
10-15% can be considered safe at TTL levels.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
None of the attempts at rearranging the resistors produced a
|
|
significantly better input circuit. Perhaps a reduction of the
|
|
capacitance of VR4 or could have helped, but this was not tried.
|
|
|
|
I "clean" solution would require a fast comparator. This would also
|
|
allow the implementation of a settable threshold voltage, e.g, for
|
|
compatibility with 1.8 V logic.
|
|
|
|
The version 1 board performs extremely well at 3.3 V and 5 V logic
|
|
levels, particularly when using a coax cable. For shorter distances,
|
|
also a ribbon cable should be adequate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusion
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
Revert the input circuit to version 1, with the following changes:
|
|
|
|
- change R2 from useless 100 kOhm to 1 kOhm or less. Consider
|
|
adding a second switchable resistor that can be put in parallel.
|
|
|
|
- use the same TVS VR4 as for VR1 through VR3, to reduce the BOM
|
|
count
|
|
|
|
- use a 0.1" connector with three contacts instead of two, so that
|
|
the signal is in the middle. This will prevent accidental shorts
|
|
and it makes it easy to build an adapter to an MMCX jack.
|