mirror of
git://projects.qi-hardware.com/ben-wpan.git
synced 2024-12-23 19:52:04 +02:00
2406f674f5
- atrf/ecn/ecn0001.txt, atrf/ecn/ecn0002.txt: changed ECN format to separate title from body by two blank lines and, where a conclusions has been reached, put it into a section separated from body also by two blank lines - atrf/ecn/ecn0003.txt: researched balun design and availability - atrf/ecn/INDEX, atrf/ecn/ecn0004.txt: new ECN: Take into account layout considerations for RF - TODO: removed item covered by ECN0002 - TODO: removed bug fixed in f32xbase commit 79396b17772639cea615d1c87870d55f08c11850 - TODO: added reference to ECN0003
74 lines
2.3 KiB
Plaintext
74 lines
2.3 KiB
Plaintext
Take into account layout considerations for RF
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are a number of layout considerationg when designing RF systems
|
|
that were not taken into account or not quantified when making the
|
|
first design.
|
|
|
|
- transmission line width
|
|
|
|
The microstrip [1] transmission line connecting the balun and filter
|
|
circuit with the antenna must be impedance-matched with the antenna.
|
|
The rule of thumb according to [2] is to make its width twice the
|
|
board thickness, in this case 0.8 mm or 31.5 mil.
|
|
|
|
The microstrip calculator at [3] also takes into account the
|
|
thickness of the copper, 1 oz, and yields a slightly narrower 57.5
|
|
mil or 1.46 mm.
|
|
|
|
A more elaborate calculator can be found at [4].
|
|
|
|
- via spacing
|
|
|
|
Section 4.2 of [5] recommends a via spacing of no more than
|
|
Lvia = C/sqrt(Er)/Fres
|
|
where
|
|
C = the speed of light, 3*10^8 m/s
|
|
Er = the board's dielectric constant, 4.5 for FR-4
|
|
Fres = the resonance frequency, at least 24.5 GHz
|
|
|
|
We thus obtain Lvia = 5 mm.
|
|
|
|
- component placing
|
|
|
|
[5] places DC blocking, balun, and filter close to the transceiver,
|
|
with only the feed line between the RF circuit and the antenna. Thus,
|
|
no changes are needed.
|
|
|
|
- feed line termination
|
|
|
|
Point 12 of [6] warns us that we may need to terminate the
|
|
transmission line if it is longer than 20% of the signal's rise time.
|
|
|
|
Point 1 of [6] gives the rise time as 1/(10*Fclk), which looks as if
|
|
it's meant for digital signals. But we'll use it anyway.
|
|
|
|
[2] gives us the typical propagation delay for a microstrip as
|
|
150 pS/in.
|
|
|
|
This means that Lmax = 0.2*tr*v
|
|
with
|
|
tr = 1/24.5 GHz
|
|
v = 1 in/150 pS
|
|
|
|
We thus obtain Lmax = 1.4 mm
|
|
|
|
[2] suggests that the maximum unterminated stub is L(in) = tr(nS).
|
|
|
|
With tr = 1/(10*Fclk), we thus obtain Lmax = 1.04 mm.
|
|
|
|
Not sure if all this even applies to antennas. This needs looking to by
|
|
someone who understands about RF.
|
|
|
|
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microstrip
|
|
[2] http://www.hottconsultants.com/techtips/rulesofthumb.html
|
|
[3] http://www.cepdinc.com/calculators/microstrip.htm
|
|
[4] http://mcalc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
[5] http://www.ti.com/litv/pdf/swra236a
|
|
[6] http://www.pcbmotif.com/home/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=104&Itemid=137
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusion: the antenna feed line needs to be revised. The via spacing
|
|
of the RF area needs to be examined. The recommended spacing may be
|
|
beyond the capabilities of a DIY process, though.
|