openwrt-xburst/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.32/813-use_netdev_alloc_skb.patch

--- a/drivers/net/b44.c
+++ b/drivers/net/b44.c
@@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ static int b44_rx(struct b44 *bp, int bu
 			struct sk_buff *copy_skb;
 
 			b44_recycle_rx(bp, cons, bp->rx_prod);
-			copy_skb = dev_alloc_skb(len + 2);
+			copy_skb = netdev_alloc_skb(bp->dev, len + 2);
 			if (copy_skb == NULL)
 				goto drop_it_no_recycle;
bcm47xx: Add basic 2.6.32 support. git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@19062 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73 2010-01-07 18:06:05 +02:00			`--- a/drivers/net/b44.c`
			`+++ b/drivers/net/b44.c`
Get rid of the b44 'BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 80000000 of register 428 to clear.' spam. more and more users are getting confused by this, and consider it a regression in brcm47xx, because brcm-2.4 was not showing this message. It's not particularly interesting for debugging, most of the time it only happens because of an unconnected port. git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@22110 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73 2010-07-10 03:48:37 +03:00			`@@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ static int b44_rx(struct b44 *bp, int bu`
bcm47xx: Add basic 2.6.32 support. git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@19062 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73 2010-01-07 18:06:05 +02:00			`struct sk_buff *copy_skb;`

			`b44_recycle_rx(bp, cons, bp->rx_prod);`
			`- copy_skb = dev_alloc_skb(len + 2);`
			`+ copy_skb = netdev_alloc_skb(bp->dev, len + 2);`
			`if (copy_skb == NULL)`
			`goto drop_it_no_recycle;`