qi-hardware/openwrt-xburst
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of git://projects.qi-hardware.com/openwrt-xburst.git synced 2024-11-30 19:43:09 +02:00
Code

mac80211: fix a race condition in the cfg80211 scanning code (thx, johill)

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@17341 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
This commit is contained in:
nbd 2009-08-20 18:49:12 +00:00
parent f6b146de59
commit 1a4a2b5ae7
1 changed files with 98 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

98
package/mac80211/patches/100-cfg80211_fix_scan_check_again.patch Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
Subject: cfg80211: check lost scans later, fix bug
When we lose a scan, cfg80211 tries to clean up after
the driver. However, it currently does this too early,
it does this in GOING_DOWN already instead of DOWN, so
it may happen with mac80211. Besides fixing this, also
make it more robust by leaking the scan request so if
the driver later actually finishes the scan, it won't
crash. Also check in ___cfg80211_scan_done whether a
scan request is still pending and exit if not.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
---
net/wireless/core.c | 4 +++-
net/wireless/core.h | 2 +-
net/wireless/scan.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/net/wireless/core.c
+++ b/net/wireless/core.c
@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ static void wdev_cleanup_work(struct wor
if (WARN_ON(rdev->scan_req && rdev->scan_req->dev == wdev->netdev)) {
rdev->scan_req->aborted = true;
- ___cfg80211_scan_done(rdev);
+ ___cfg80211_scan_done(rdev, true);
}
cfg80211_unlock_rdev(rdev);
@@ -755,6 +755,8 @@ static int cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call
default:
break;
}
+ break;
+ case NETDEV_DOWN:
dev_hold(dev);
schedule_work(&wdev->cleanup_work);
break;
--- a/net/wireless/core.h
+++ b/net/wireless/core.h
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ void cfg80211_sme_scan_done(struct net_d
void cfg80211_sme_rx_auth(struct net_device *dev, const u8 *buf, size_t len);
void cfg80211_sme_disassoc(struct net_device *dev, int idx);
void __cfg80211_scan_done(struct work_struct *wk);
-void ___cfg80211_scan_done(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev);
+void ___cfg80211_scan_done(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev, bool leak);
void cfg80211_upload_connect_keys(struct wireless_dev *wdev);
struct ieee80211_channel *
--- a/net/wireless/scan.c
+++ b/net/wireless/scan.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
#define IEEE80211_SCAN_RESULT_EXPIRE (15 * HZ)
-void ___cfg80211_scan_done(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev)
+void ___cfg80211_scan_done(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev, bool leak)
{
struct cfg80211_scan_request *request;
struct net_device *dev;
@@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ void ___cfg80211_scan_done(struct cfg802
request = rdev->scan_req;
+ if (!request)
+ return;
+
dev = request->dev;
/*
@@ -53,7 +56,17 @@ void ___cfg80211_scan_done(struct cfg802
dev_put(dev);
rdev->scan_req = NULL;
- kfree(request);
+
+ /*
+ * OK. If this is invoked with "leak" then we can't
+ * free this ... but we've cleaned it up anyway. The
+ * driver failed to call the scan_done callback, so
+ * all bets are off, it might still be trying to use
+ * the scan request or not ... if it accesses the dev
+ * in there (it shouldn't anyway) then it may crash.
+ */
+ if (!leak)
+ kfree(request);
}
void __cfg80211_scan_done(struct work_struct *wk)
@@ -64,7 +77,7 @@ void __cfg80211_scan_done(struct work_st
scan_done_wk);
cfg80211_lock_rdev(rdev);
- ___cfg80211_scan_done(rdev);
+ ___cfg80211_scan_done(rdev, false);
cfg80211_unlock_rdev(rdev);
}