qi-hardware/openwrt-xburst
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of git://projects.qi-hardware.com/openwrt-xburst.git synced 2025-04-21 12:27:27 +03:00
Code Activity

Initial revision

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk/openwrt@197 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
This commit is contained in:
mbm
2005-01-16 11:43:02 +00:00
commit 2f006aa5e8
280 changed files with 69781 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

68
toolchain/binutils/2.15.91.0.2/701-binutils-dup-sections.patch Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-08/msg00256.html
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:13:43 -0400
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Subject: Re: Handle SEC_LINK_DUPLICATES_SAME_CONTENTS for arm-linux
Message-ID: <20040821011342.GA30319@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <20040818145518.GA9774@nevyn.them.org> <20040819055040.GA11820@lucon.org> <20040819080034.GE21716@bubble.modra.org> <20040820173240.GA17678@nevyn.them.org> <20040821003737.GB16016@bubble.modra.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040821003737 dot GB16016 at bubble dot modra dot org>
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 10:07:38AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 01:32:40PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Thanks. How's this?
>
> As you might have guessed from my rather slack review of your previous
> patch, I trust you enough to give the OK without proper review. But
> since you asked... :)
Checked in as so.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
[ rediffed against binutils-2.15.91.0.2, with some elbow grease ]
2004-08-20 Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
* elflink.c (_bfd_elf_section_already_linked): Handle
SEC_LINK_DUPLICATES_SAME_CONTENTS.
--- binutils-2.15.91.0.2/bfd/elflink.c.old 2004-07-27 21:36:08.000000000 -0700
+++ binutils-2.15.91.0.2/bfd/elflink.c 2004-08-26 06:38:07.000000000 -0700
@@ -9359,6 +9359,35 @@
(_("%s: %s: warning: duplicate section `%s' has different size\n"),
bfd_archive_filename (abfd), name);
break;
+ case SEC_LINK_DUPLICATES_SAME_CONTENTS:
+ if (sec->size != l->sec->size)
+ (*_bfd_error_handler)
+ (_("%B: duplicate section `%A' has different size\n"),
+ bfd_archive_filename (abfd), sec);
+ else if (sec->size != 0)
+ {
+ bfd_byte *sec_contents, *l_sec_contents;
+
+ if (!bfd_malloc_and_get_section (abfd, sec, &sec_contents))
+ (*_bfd_error_handler)
+ (_("%B: warning: could not read contents of section `%A'\n"),
+ bfd_archive_filename (abfd), sec);
+ else if (!bfd_malloc_and_get_section (l->sec->owner, l->sec,
+ &l_sec_contents))
+ (*_bfd_error_handler)
+ (_("%B: warning: could not read contents of section `%A'\n"),
+ bfd_archive_filename(l->sec->owner), l->sec);
+ else if (memcmp (sec_contents, l_sec_contents, sec->size) != 0)
+ (*_bfd_error_handler)
+ (_("%B: warning: duplicate section `%A' has different contents\n"),
+ bfd_archive_filename (abfd), sec);
+
+ if (sec_contents)
+ free (sec_contents);
+ if (l_sec_contents)
+ free (l_sec_contents);
+ }
+ break;
}
/* Set the output_section field so that lang_add_section