qi-hardware/openwrt-xburst
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of git://projects.qi-hardware.com/openwrt-xburst.git synced 2024-12-26 15:26:46 +02:00
Code

split eeprom_93cx6 patch to make quilt happy

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@9084 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
This commit is contained in:
juhosg 2007-10-01 08:45:39 +00:00
parent b7bfd6b6ea
commit 6f924b0772
2 changed files with 116 additions and 116 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

116
target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.22/600-eeprom_93cx6.patch
View File

@ -356,119 +356,3 @@ index 0000000..d774b77
+ const u8 word, u16 *data); + const u8 word, u16 *data);
+extern void eeprom_93cx6_multiread(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom, +extern void eeprom_93cx6_multiread(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom,
+ const u8 word, __le16 *data, const u16 words); + const u8 word, __le16 *data, const u16 words);
From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 21:06:01 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: [PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: Add comment for 1us delay after pulse
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.23-rc1~1201^2~73
X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=4b914dc0493edff19ff698a18198a173a14ba9d2
[PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: Add comment for 1us delay after pulse
This will add a comment for the 1us delay which is taken
after the pulse has been switched. The 1us delay is based
on the specifications so that should be made clear.
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
index bfcb434..0d6d742 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
@@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_high(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
{
eeprom->reg_data_clock = 1;
eeprom->register_write(eeprom);
+
+ /*
+ * Add a short delay for the pulse to work.
+ * According to the specifications the minimal time
+ * should be 450ns so a 1us delay is sufficient.
+ */
udelay(1);
}
@@ -46,6 +52,12 @@ static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_low(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
{
eeprom->reg_data_clock = 0;
eeprom->register_write(eeprom);
+
+ /*
+ * Add a short delay for the pulse to work.
+ * According to the specifications the minimal time
+ * should be 450ns so a 1us delay is sufficient.
+ */
udelay(1);
}
From: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:37:46 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: [PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: shorten pulse timing to match spec
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.23-rc1~1201^2~71
X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=7e9400f178d291b2208c4ed9aac0f425c1364000
[PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: shorten pulse timing to match spec
93cx6 datasheet available here:
http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/21749F.pdf
Figure 1-1 and Table 1-2 on pages 4-5 indicate that both Clock High
Time and Clock Low Time have largest minimum times of 450ns.
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
index 0d6d742..ac515b0 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
@@ -42,10 +42,10 @@ static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_high(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
/*
* Add a short delay for the pulse to work.
- * According to the specifications the minimal time
- * should be 450ns so a 1us delay is sufficient.
+ * According to the specifications the "maximum minimum"
+ * time should be 450ns.
*/
- udelay(1);
+ ndelay(450);
}
static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_low(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:31:44 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: eeprom_93cx6: shorten pulse timing to match spec (bis)
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.23-rc1~1151^2~11
X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=8abd531e3f77188de2fc41e677d075cc66e61631
eeprom_93cx6: shorten pulse timing to match spec (bis)
Based on an original idea by John W. Linville.
It is the missing part of 42d45ccd60636c28e35c2016f091783bc14ad99c
Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
---
diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
index ac515b0..ea55654 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
@@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_low(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
/*
* Add a short delay for the pulse to work.
- * According to the specifications the minimal time
- * should be 450ns so a 1us delay is sufficient.
+ * According to the specifications the "maximum minimum"
+ * time should be 450ns.
*/
- udelay(1);
+ ndelay(450);
}
static void eeprom_93cx6_startup(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)

116
target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.22/601-eeprom_93cx6_fixes.patch Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 21:06:01 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: [PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: Add comment for 1us delay after pulse
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.23-rc1~1201^2~73
X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=4b914dc0493edff19ff698a18198a173a14ba9d2
[PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: Add comment for 1us delay after pulse
This will add a comment for the 1us delay which is taken
after the pulse has been switched. The 1us delay is based
on the specifications so that should be made clear.
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
index bfcb434..0d6d742 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
@@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_high(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
{
eeprom->reg_data_clock = 1;
eeprom->register_write(eeprom);
+
+ /*
+ * Add a short delay for the pulse to work.
+ * According to the specifications the minimal time
+ * should be 450ns so a 1us delay is sufficient.
+ */
udelay(1);
}
@@ -46,6 +52,12 @@ static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_low(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
{
eeprom->reg_data_clock = 0;
eeprom->register_write(eeprom);
+
+ /*
+ * Add a short delay for the pulse to work.
+ * According to the specifications the minimal time
+ * should be 450ns so a 1us delay is sufficient.
+ */
udelay(1);
}
From: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:37:46 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: [PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: shorten pulse timing to match spec
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.23-rc1~1201^2~71
X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=7e9400f178d291b2208c4ed9aac0f425c1364000
[PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: shorten pulse timing to match spec
93cx6 datasheet available here:
http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/21749F.pdf
Figure 1-1 and Table 1-2 on pages 4-5 indicate that both Clock High
Time and Clock Low Time have largest minimum times of 450ns.
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
index 0d6d742..ac515b0 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
@@ -42,10 +42,10 @@ static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_high(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
/*
* Add a short delay for the pulse to work.
- * According to the specifications the minimal time
- * should be 450ns so a 1us delay is sufficient.
+ * According to the specifications the "maximum minimum"
+ * time should be 450ns.
*/
- udelay(1);
+ ndelay(450);
}
static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_low(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:31:44 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: eeprom_93cx6: shorten pulse timing to match spec (bis)
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.23-rc1~1151^2~11
X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=8abd531e3f77188de2fc41e677d075cc66e61631
eeprom_93cx6: shorten pulse timing to match spec (bis)
Based on an original idea by John W. Linville.
It is the missing part of 42d45ccd60636c28e35c2016f091783bc14ad99c
Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
---
diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
index ac515b0..ea55654 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
@@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_low(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
/*
* Add a short delay for the pulse to work.
- * According to the specifications the minimal time
- * should be 450ns so a 1us delay is sufficient.
+ * According to the specifications the "maximum minimum"
+ * time should be 450ns.
*/
- udelay(1);
+ ndelay(450);
}
static void eeprom_93cx6_startup(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)