mirror of
git://projects.qi-hardware.com/openwrt-xburst.git
synced 2024-11-02 00:29:41 +02:00
0ffbe196d5
git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@30375 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
75 lines
2.9 KiB
Diff
75 lines
2.9 KiB
Diff
http://bugs.gentoo.org/392645
|
|
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13470
|
|
|
|
2011-12-03 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
PR ld/13470
|
|
* elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Revert substantive
|
|
change in 2011-07-01 commit. Comment.
|
|
* elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Likewise.
|
|
|
|
===================================================================
|
|
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elf32-ppc.c,v
|
|
retrieving revision 1.302.2.1
|
|
retrieving revision 1.302.2.2
|
|
--- a/bfd/elf32-ppc.c
|
|
+++ b/bfd/elf32-ppc.c
|
|
@@ -2987,10 +2987,6 @@ ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct bfd
|
|
edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
|
|
edir->elf.pointer_equality_needed |= eind->elf.pointer_equality_needed;
|
|
|
|
- /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. */
|
|
- if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
|
|
- return;
|
|
-
|
|
if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
|
|
{
|
|
if (edir->dyn_relocs != NULL)
|
|
@@ -3022,6 +3018,16 @@ ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct bfd
|
|
eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
+ /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
|
|
+ You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over; After all,
|
|
+ both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
|
|
+ moving reloc accounting around. However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS
|
|
+ code in ppc_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
|
|
+ dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
|
|
+ DIR sym here. */
|
|
+ if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
|
|
+ return;
|
|
+
|
|
/* Copy over the GOT refcount entries that we may have already seen to
|
|
the symbol which just became indirect. */
|
|
edir->elf.got.refcount += eind->elf.got.refcount;
|
|
--- a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
|
|
+++ b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
|
|
@@ -4435,10 +4435,6 @@ ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct b
|
|
edir->elf.ref_regular_nonweak |= eind->elf.ref_regular_nonweak;
|
|
edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
|
|
|
|
- /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. */
|
|
- if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
|
|
- return;
|
|
-
|
|
/* Copy over any dynamic relocs we may have on the indirect sym. */
|
|
if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
|
|
{
|
|
@@ -4471,6 +4467,16 @@ ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct b
|
|
eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
+ /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
|
|
+ You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over; After all,
|
|
+ both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
|
|
+ moving reloc accounting around. However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS
|
|
+ code in ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
|
|
+ dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
|
|
+ DIR sym here. */
|
|
+ if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
|
|
+ return;
|
|
+
|
|
/* Copy over got entries that we may have already seen to the
|
|
symbol which just became indirect. */
|
|
if (eind->elf.got.glist != NULL)
|