From 405a1505d1b87f5384f3f61c5c4ae1f7c34ed32f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Werner Almesberger Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:15:29 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] m1/patches/rtems/: updated status of patches that have moved into bugzilla --- m1/patches/rtems/chain-first-last.patch | 4 ++-- m1/patches/rtems/rbtree-container-of.patch | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/m1/patches/rtems/chain-first-last.patch b/m1/patches/rtems/chain-first-last.patch index 07ae046..e9434ac 100644 --- a/m1/patches/rtems/chain-first-last.patch +++ b/m1/patches/rtems/chain-first-last.patch @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -This issue is under consideration: -http://www.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-users/2011-November/009130.html +This issue is under review: +https://www.rtems.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1964 Doubly-linked lists ("chains") in RTEMS have a "control" block that looks like the next/prev link pair in an element. The list elements diff --git a/m1/patches/rtems/rbtree-container-of.patch b/m1/patches/rtems/rbtree-container-of.patch index afdcb02..548f2bb 100644 --- a/m1/patches/rtems/rbtree-container-of.patch +++ b/m1/patches/rtems/rbtree-container-of.patch @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -This issue is under consideration: -http://www.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-users/2011-November/009097.html +This issue is under review: +https://www.rtems.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1963 There seem to be two issues in the original code: