mirror of
git://projects.qi-hardware.com/xburst-tools.git
synced 2024-11-22 22:00:36 +02:00
qi-gta02-remap-steppingstone.patch
Despite what the docs say, steppingstone is always resident at 0x40000000 on s3c2442, this patch changes our linker script to stick all steppingstone code there. The mapping of steppingstone at 0x0 is broken by OM[] bus change dynamically caused for example by GTA02 AUX button actuation. Signed-off-by: Andy Green <andy@openmoko.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9a6d9de901
commit
40edd785a7
@ -27,20 +27,21 @@ OUTPUT_ARCH(arm)
|
||||
ENTRY(_start)
|
||||
SECTIONS
|
||||
{
|
||||
. = 0x00000000;
|
||||
__steppingstone_always = 0x40000000;
|
||||
__qi_sdram_copy = 0x33000000;
|
||||
|
||||
. = __steppingstone_always;
|
||||
|
||||
/* this is intended to take the first 4KBytes of stuff initially.
|
||||
* We have to make sure we have .rodata* in there for everything
|
||||
* because we do not compile PIC.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
. = ALIGN(4);
|
||||
.text :
|
||||
.text __steppingstone_always : AT (0x0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
src/cpu/s3c2442/start.o (.text .rodata* .data .bss)
|
||||
src/cpu/s3c2442/lowlevel_init.o (.text .rodata* .data .bss)
|
||||
src/cpu/s3c2442/start_qi.o (.text .rodata* .data .bss)
|
||||
/* src/blink_led.o (.text .rodata* .data .bss) */
|
||||
src/cpu/s3c2442/nand_read.o (.text .rodata* .data .bss)
|
||||
src/cpu/s3c2442/serial-s3c24xx.o (.text .rodata* .data .bss)
|
||||
src/memory-test.o (.text .rodata* .data .bss)
|
||||
@ -50,10 +51,10 @@ SECTIONS
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
. = ALIGN(4);
|
||||
.everything_else ADDR (.text) + SIZEOF (.text) + 0x33000000 :
|
||||
AT ( ADDR (.text) + SIZEOF (.text) ) { *(.text .rodata* .data) }
|
||||
.everything_else ADDR (.text) - __steppingstone_always + SIZEOF (.text) + __qi_sdram_copy :
|
||||
AT ( ADDR (.text) - __steppingstone_always + SIZEOF (.text) ) { *(.text .rodata* .data) }
|
||||
|
||||
. = 0x33800000 ;
|
||||
. = __qi_sdram_copy + 0x800000 ;
|
||||
__bss_start = .;
|
||||
.bss (NOLOAD) :
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user